From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of California Packing Corp.

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Jun 1, 1923
121 Misc. 212 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1923)

Opinion

June, 1923.

Kendall Herzog, for petitioner.

Teitelbaum Jaykowsky, for respondent.


This is an application for an order directing that an arbitration proceed in the state of California on the disputes that have arisen between the California Packing Corporation and Alexander Palestine. The written agreement between the parties provides for such an arbitration to be had in California and before the Dried Fruit Association of California. I do not believe under the Arbitration Law this court may compel the respondent to arbitrate before a foreign corporation without the state, for the reason that no award taken without the state may be the basis of a judgment. In California neither party could be compelled to arbitrate under their agreement. California Civil Code, § 3390. If the arbitration be had within this state a commission may issue to take depositions of witnesses. If the petitioner will arbitrate here before arbitrators to be agreed upon by the parties an order may be entered to that effect; otherwise the motion is denied.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of California Packing Corp.

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Jun 1, 1923
121 Misc. 212 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1923)
Case details for

Matter of California Packing Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of CALIFORNIA PACKING CORPORATION, for an…

Court:Supreme Court, New York Special Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1923

Citations

121 Misc. 212 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1923)
201 N.Y.S. 158

Citing Cases

In re the Arbitration between United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America & General Electric Co.

Article 84 of the Civil Practice Act confers no authority upon the court to grant to an award in arbitration…