From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cahill v. Casey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 1992
180 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

February 10, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (West, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

By posted notice dated July 18, 1988, the Westchester County Personnel Office listed various police departments whose members would be eligible to take part in an upcoming promotion examination for police lieutenant. For 10 of the 11 departments listed, the qualifying experience necessary to sit for the examination was, "[i]mmediately preceding the time of examination, must have 12 months of permanent competitive class status as a Sergeant in the appointing jurisdiction". For the remaining department, the Village of Port Chester, the qualifying experience was listed as "immediately preceding the time of examination, must have 12 months of permanent competitive class status as a Sergeant or 60 months of permanent competitive class status as a Police Officer". The petitioner claims that the Westchester County Personnel Office acted in an arbitrary, capricious, and illegal manner in declaring that ordinary patrolmen with 60 months experience were eligible to sit for the police lieutenant's promotion examination in the Village of Port Chester. The petitioner sought to restrict such eligibility to officers with 12 months of permanent competitive class status as a sergeant.

Civil Service Law § 52 (1) provides in relevant part that "vacancies in positions in the competitive class shall be filled, as far as practicable, by promotion from among persons holding competitive class positions in a lower grade in the department in which the vacancy exists, provided that such lower grade positions are in direct line of promotion, as determined by the state civil service department or municipal commission". "It is well established that the determination of what positions are in the `direct line of promotion' is one for the Civil Service Commission to make, and that the commission has a right to impose certain terms and conditions of eligibility as a prerequisite to admission to any examination" (Matter of Chapin v. Schechter, 23 Misc.2d 190, 192, affd 13 A.D.2d 473). We decline to interfere with the Personnel Office's exercise of broad discretion in determining that patrolmen with 60 months experience were in the direct line of promotion and, therefore, eligible to sit for the lieutenant's examination.

Additionally, courts should not interfere with the minimum qualifications for promotion established by a civil service commission if any fair argument can be made to support the determination. This rule applies even though a court may disagree as to the advisability of the determination setting the minimum qualifications for promotion (see, Matter of Quigley v. Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn., 153 A.D.2d 892; Matter of Kamensky v Barclay, 123 A.D.2d 694; Matter of Wirzberger v. Watson, 305 N.Y. 507). Here, it was determined that an examination limited to sergeants with 12 months experience was almost certain to generate an inadequate list since the Village of Port Chester could have had the need for as many as six appointments in the ensuing year. Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Cahill v. Casey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 1992
180 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Cahill v. Casey

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES CAHILL, Appellant, v. J. EMMET CASEY, as Personnel…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Matter of McGrath v. Safir

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.) We agree with the IAS Court that the July…

In re Keith Hedeman

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The respondents are allowed great discretion in their…