From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bush v. New York St. Bd. of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 4, 1996
223 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 4, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


After a hearing, petitioner was found guilty of consuming alcohol, possessing a handgun and threatening to kill his wife, which were violations of the terms of his parole. As a result, respondent revoked petitioner's parole and ordered him held for three years in prison. Petitioner raises a number of challenges to this determination, most of which relate to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting it. We have considered petitioner's claims and find them to be without merit. The testimony of the parole officer and petitioner's wife, combined with the documentary evidence admitted at the hearing, provides substantial evidence supporting respondent's determination. The fact that the gun was inoperable does not affect this determination as we have held that possession of such a weapon may constitute a violation of parole ( see, People ex rel. Branch v Barnes, 199 A.D.2d 726). Lastly, we do not find that the sanction imposed was disproportionate to the offense in light of the circumstances.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Bush v. New York St. Bd. of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 4, 1996
223 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Bush v. New York St. Bd. of Parole

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GREGORY BUSH, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 4, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
636 N.Y.S.2d 158

Citing Cases

Matter of Chestnut v. Donelli

Unlike Rule #8, there is no Penal Law component to the condition and this Court therefore concludes that the…