From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bush Terminal Roofing v. Bd. of Educ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1982
91 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

December 20, 1982


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Board of Education of the City of New York rejecting petitioner's bid on a contract for roofing rehabilitation, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pino, J.), dated July 6, 1982, which, inter alia, dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The respondent board of education solicited bids on a contract for roofing rehabilitation at Hillcrest High School in Queens and petitioner submitted the second lowest bid. The lowest bidder was disqualified about seven months after the bids were opened, and the board, without notifying petitioner, awarded the contract to respondent Signet Construction Co. Petitioner learned in October, 1981 that it had been by-passed and informed the director of contracts for the board of education of the error. The board acknowledged the error, but subsequently rejected petitioner's bid on the ground it did not conform to specifications. The instant proceeding for article 78 relief was properly dismissed since it became moot when the work on the contract had substantially been completed. Weinstein, J.P., Gulotta, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Bush Terminal Roofing v. Bd. of Educ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1982
91 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Bush Terminal Roofing v. Bd. of Educ

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BUSH TERMINAL ROOFING AND CONTRACTING, INC., Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1982

Citations

91 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Harris v. Mattingly

The courts have held that where a competitive bidding process for a contract is at issue but the work under…