Opinion
December, 1932.
Order reversed on the law, and proceeding dismissed, without costs, on the ground that petitioner was guilty of laches. Van Kirk, P.J., Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur; Hinman and Hill, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Burgey v. Brearton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Summaries of
Matter of Burgey v. Brearton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for
Matter of Burgey v. Brearton
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Application of EBER BURGEY, Respondent, for an Order…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1932
Citations
237 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)