Opinion
August 21, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the petitioners, as the providers of foster care rather than the recipients thereof, do not have standing to seek administrative review of the adequacy of foster care payments that were made on behalf of children who no longer reside with them (see, Matter of Tobias v Bane, 218 A.D.2d 743 [decided herewith]).
The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.