From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brunner v. Speckard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 28, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Gorski, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: This appeal from a judgment that denied petitioner's challenge to a determination of the Parole Board to deny parole release is moot. The determination expired during the pendency of this appeal, and a subsequent determination to deny parole release was made (see, Matter of Chenier v Richard W., 82 N.Y.2d 830, 832). This appeal does not present a novel issue that is likely to recur and will typically evade review (see, Matter of Chenier v Richard W., supra; Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714-715).


Summaries of

Matter of Brunner v. Speckard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Brunner v. Speckard

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FREDERICK BRUNNER, Appellant, v. HUBERT SPECKARD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 600

Citing Cases

Stuart v. Annucci

Consequently, this appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Romano v. Annucci , 196 A.D.3d 1176, 1176,…

Stuart v. Annucci

Consequently, this appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Romano v Annucci, 196 A.D.3d 1176, 1176…