From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brugman v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 6, 1995
217 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 6, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


Petitioner was found guilty after a Superintendent's hearing of violating State-wide rules prohibiting fighting, assault, violent conduct and possession of a weapon. The misbehavior report, authored by a correction officer, stated that confidential sources identified petitioner as having attacked and beaten another inmate with a mop handle. The report was corroborated by the testimony of the victim of the assault. This constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt and renders any failure by the Hearing Officer to ascertain the reliability and credibility of confidential sources of information harmless. Further, petitioner waived any argument as to the Hearing Officer's failure to personally confirm the refusal of his requested witnesses to testify. In any event, the record reflects that the witnesses credibly indicated that they did not witness the incident, so that their testimony would have been of little or no relevance.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Brugman v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 6, 1995
217 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Brugman v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RICHARD BRUGMAN, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 114

Citing Cases

Holloway v. Lacy

Initially, we reject petitioner's challenge to the Hearing Officer's review of confidential evidence. Even if…

In re Wan

Upon review of the numerous challenges raised by petitioner in this proceeding, we conclude that the…