From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brown v. Rotker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 17, 1995
214 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 17, 1995

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,


Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16). The petitioner here has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. We note that the petitioner may take a direct appeal in the event that the underlying indictment is dismissed (see, CPL 450.20, 210.20 Crim. Proc.). Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Thompson and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Brown v. Rotker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 17, 1995
214 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Brown v. Rotker

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RICHARD A. BROWN, Petitioner, v. SEYMOUR ROTKER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 17, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 932

Citing Cases

Whiting v. Houghton

" The part of that statute applicable to the subject matter of discussion is § 4, which reads: ". . . where…

Hurd v. Chesley

Where there is no declaration or no cause of action stated in the declaration, it cannot be amended; nothing…