From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brooklyn Hospital v. Lennon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 14, 1978
45 N.Y.2d 820 (N.Y. 1978)

Summary

stating that "denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value"

Summary of this case from Olin Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America

Opinion

Submitted August 28, 1978

Decided September 14, 1978


Motion by acting superintendent for leave to appeal denied, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Motion by intervenor for leave to appeal denied, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

The court takes this occasion to restate the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 N.Y. 284, 297-298).


Summaries of

Matter of Brooklyn Hospital v. Lennon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 14, 1978
45 N.Y.2d 820 (N.Y. 1978)

stating that "denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value"

Summary of this case from Olin Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America

In Matter of Brooklyn Hosp. v Lennon (45 N.Y.2d 820), the court took occasion to restate the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value.

Summary of this case from Forty Exch. Co. v. Cohen
Case details for

Matter of Brooklyn Hospital v. Lennon

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BROOKLYN HOSPITAL et al., Respondents, v. JOHN F. LENNON…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 14, 1978

Citations

45 N.Y.2d 820 (N.Y. 1978)

Citing Cases

Ring v. Langdon

Indeed, rather than "clarifying" the meaning of the phrase "regular duties" by showing that it was meant to…

Panico v. Young

Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave…