From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Britton v. Britton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 15, 2002
292 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

311

March 15, 2002.

MANNION COPANI, SYRACUSE (ANTHONY F. COPANI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

MACHT, BRENIZER GINGOLD, P.C., SYRACUSE (JON W. BRENIZER OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an amended order of Family Court, Onondaga County (Rossi, J.), entered August 8, 2001, which, inter alia, confirmed the Hearing Officer's finding of willful violation.

PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, SCUDDER, BURNS, AND GORSKI, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the amended order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by suspending the commitment pending determination of the hearing and as modified the amended order is affirmed without costs and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Onondaga County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum:

Family Court properly determined that respondent failed to establish that he is entitled to a downward modification of his child support obligation ( see, Matter of Boden v. Boden, 42 N.Y.2d 210, 212-213). Moreover, we agree with the court that respondent willfully violated the child support order, which directed respondent to pay the child support provided for in the separation agreement and judgment of divorce, by unilaterally reducing his child support payments despite then having the means to make the ordered payments ( see, Matter of Mazzilli v. Mazzilli, 248 A.D.2d 474). We conclude, however, that the court erred in denying respondent's request for a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act § 455 (2) to determine whether he was financially unable to comply with the child support order at the time of the commitment order and thus whether he should be relieved of the payments directed in the child support order. We therefore modify the amended order in appeal No. 1 by suspending the commitment pending determination of the hearing, and we remit the matter to Family Court, Onondaga County, for a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act § 455(2). We suspend the order in appeal No. 3 pending determination of the hearing.


Summaries of

Matter of Britton v. Britton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 15, 2002
292 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Matter of Britton v. Britton

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF EDITH L. BRITTON, Petitioner-respondent, v. JAMES BRITTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 15, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 627

Citing Cases

Matter of Britton v. Britton

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without…

Matter of Britton v. Britton

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously suspended without…