From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brandon J

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2003
302 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CAF 02-02659

February 7, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Monroe County (Taddeo, J.), entered April 24, 2002, which placed respondent in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months.

ARDETH L. HOUDE, LAW GUARDIAN, ROCHESTER, For Respondent-appellant.

CHARLES S. TURNER, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT W. WESTERVELT OF COUNSEL), Petitioner-respondent PRO SE.

PRESENT: PINE, J.P., HURLBUTT, KEHOE, BURNS, AND HAYES, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Respondent appeals from an order that found that he had violated the conditions of probation imposed on a prior adjudication of juvenile delinquency. Respondent contends that he was denied due process and equal protection because Family Court denied his request for a dispositional hearing. That contention is not preserved for our review (see Matter of Jasen P.M., 289 A.D.2d 1033) and, in any event, lacks merit. It is well settled that "no new dispositional hearing is required upon a finding that a juvenile delinquent has violated the conditions of probation" (Matter of Edwin L., 88 N.Y.2d 593, 601, citing Family Ct Act § 360.3; see Jasen P.M., 289 A.D.2d 1033; Matter of Vincent B., 239 A.D.2d 925, 926). Contrary to respondent's further contention, the court was not required to state its findings in open court. The court complied with the requirements of the Family Ct Act by stating its findings in the written order (see § 352.2 [2] [b]; [3]).


Summaries of

Matter of Brandon J

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2003
302 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Matter of Brandon J

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF BRANDON J., Respondent-appellant. MONROE COUNTY ATTORNEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 7, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 534

Citing Cases

Mtr. of Michael

We thus conclude that the court properly ordered the least restrictive available alternative that "is…

In the Matter of Vanessa S

The sole contention of respondent on appeal is that her right to due process was denied when Family Court…