From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Box

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 6, 1990
168 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 6, 1990

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Although claimant argues to the contrary, the record offers ample support for the conclusion that claimant was actively engaged in his own business and was therefore not totally unemployed for the entire period for which he received benefits. The fact that he may have still been seeking work as an employee is irrelevant (see, Matter of Schreiber [Lubin], 5 A.D.2d 745). Furthermore, the overpayments made to claimant were properly recoverable under Labor Law § 597 (4) (see, Matter of Council [Roberts], 132 A.D.2d 437).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Casey, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Box

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 6, 1990
168 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Box

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of DAVID A. BOX, Appellant. THOMAS F. HARTNETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
564 N.Y.S.2d 209

Citing Cases

Matter of Arseneau

The record is replete with evidence, submitted by claimant himself, that he commenced preliminary business…