From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bookhout v. Central School District No. 2 of Guilderland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1954
284 App. Div. 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

November 18, 1954.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Schenectady County.

Present — Foster, P.J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.


It is alleged that claimant sustained personal injuries on October 20, 1952, when his car was struck from the rear by a school bus owned by appellant. The motion was made on the ground that claimant could not file his notice of claim within the ninety-day period because of disability. The attorney for claimant wrote a letter dated October 22, 1952, to "Guilderland Central School" regarding the accident. Claimant voted at the election held on November 4, 1952. On January 21, 1954, a bare summons was served, apparently on behalf of claimant's attorney, incorrectly designating the defendant as "Guilderland Central School". A motion for leave to file a notice of claim against such designated defendant was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and subsequently the motion resulting in the order on appeal was made. Appellant contends that the conduct above-mentioned demonstrates that claimant was not disabled during the ninety-day period. It does not appear that claimant personally directed or authorized the letter or the service of the summons. It appears that the letter written by claimant's attorney was written at the request of claimant's wife, made over the telephone. The affidavit of claimant's attending physician, after relating the nature of claimant's injuries, states: "That claimant to my knowledge was confined to his home in view of his condition between the time of the accident and up to January 31, 1953. That as a result of said injuries said Melville M. Bookhout, Sr., was caused to suffer great pain and suffering, which caused him to be irrational, disorientated and unstable and said conditions would prevent him from protecting his legal rights during said time". The order was discretionary and, upon this state of the record, we may not say that the court at Special Term abused the discretion. ( Matter of Sullivan v. City of Watervliet, 282 App. Div. 109 7; Matter of Colehamer v. City of Albany, 276 A D 809; Matter of Cummings v. City of New York, 280 App. Div. 775.) Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs.


Summaries of

Bookhout v. Central School District No. 2 of Guilderland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1954
284 App. Div. 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Bookhout v. Central School District No. 2 of Guilderland

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MELVILLE M. BOOKHOUT, SR., Respondent, against CENTRAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1954

Citations

284 App. Div. 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

Matter of Reynolds v. Greece Cent. Sch. Dist

( Matter of Biberias v. New York City Tr. Auth., 27 N.Y.2d 890, 891-892.) Instances in which leave to serve…

Matter of Osborn v. Board of Education

The County Court's finding and resultant order were within the limits of its discretion. (See Matter of…