From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Blue v. Wilkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 21, 1979
71 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

August 21, 1979


In a proceeding to invalidate the petition designating Samuel A. Wilkins, Jr., and Hermon Lockhart, Jr., as candidates in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 11, 1979 for the party position of member of the County Committee from the 78th Election District in the Town of Greenburgh, the appeal is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 16, 1979, as granted the application as to Samuel A. Wilkins, Jr. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The residence address of candidate Wilkins was not set forth in compliance with subdivision 1 of section 6-132 Elec. of the Election Law (see Matter of Finneran v. Hayduk, 64 A.D.2d 937, affd 45 N.Y.2d 797). This defect invalidated all three pages of the designating petition insofar as they pertain to Wilkins. We note that petitioner seeks to raise certain issues which relate to that portion of the judgment which dismissed the petition as to Hermon Lockhart, Jr. Since petitioner failed to file a notice of cross appeal from that portion of the judgment, we do not reach those issues. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Gulotta, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Blue v. Wilkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 21, 1979
71 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Matter of Blue v. Wilkins

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDITH BLUE, Respondent, v. SAMUEL A. WILKINS, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 21, 1979

Citations

71 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Matter of Wilkins v. Blue

In a proceeding to invalidate the petition designating the appellants as candidates in the Democratic Party…

Matter of Coster v. Lewins

The motion was not made until after two hearings had been concluded. We are in accord with Special Term's…