From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Block v. Markham Puffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 15, 1946
270 App. Div. 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

May 15, 1946.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Law.


In the absence of more specific statutory direction, we consider that proof of the advance payments and the employer's testimony of a claim and demand for reimbursement, duly made and incorporated into the minutes and record of the case, constitutes a sufficient filing of the claim to entitle its payment. This, notwithstanding the fact that the formalities contended for, such as a separate filing of a written claim made upon a prescribed form, would be in furtherance of more orderly record. Award and decision modified so as to grant reimbursement as directed by the decision of the referee, and as modified affirmed, without costs. All concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Block v. Markham Puffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 15, 1946
270 App. Div. 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Matter of Block v. Markham Puffer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of BENTON S. BLOCK, Respondent, against MARKHAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 15, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Matter of White v. Barrett

The first award of compensation was made September 8, 1953 and was affirmed here ( 285 App. Div. 909). Almost…

Matter of Poveromo v. Taylor

This court has but recently held that a demand for reimbursement appearing somewhat casually in the testimony…