From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Blakes v. Jacobson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 1999
259 A.D.2d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 4, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.).


Given the gravity of the admitted misconduct, we do not find the sanction imposed so disproportionate to the offense as to shock our sense of fairness ( see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 232-233). Petitioner's claim, that the off-duty conduct for which he was disciplined is not actionable under department disciplinary guidelines, is waived since it was not raised in his petition or in the ensuing administrative proceedings. In any event, the claim lacks merit ( see, Matter of Fox v. Finnerty, 62 N.Y.2d 796, revg 96 A.D.2d 905).

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Lerner, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Blakes v. Jacobson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 1999
259 A.D.2d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Blakes v. Jacobson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of QUINTON BLAKES, Appellant, v. MICHAEL JACOBSON, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 90

Citing Cases

In re Sackets Harbor C.S.D. v. Munoz

The record unequivocally demonstrates that the Committee Chair directed that a vote be taken to resolve the…