From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MATTER OF BETTCHER v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 21, 1938
255 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

September 21, 1938.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


The State Industrial Board has made findings that claimant contracted a right inguinal hernia as an occupational disease, arising from the nature of his employment, which necessitated the continuous lifting and carrying of heavy objects, weighing approximately 150 to 156 pounds, and from the fact that he was subjected to constant strain from such lifting. A physician testifies as to causal relation: "Q. In your opinion, could the condition which he has, be brought about as the result of the work which he had been doing, assuming, of course, that he did not have any hernia there before he went to work there? * * * A. Yes, I think it would. I understand he followed this over a period of about sixteen months." Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

MATTER OF BETTCHER v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 21, 1938
255 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

MATTER OF BETTCHER v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of WILLIAM BETTCHER, Respondent, against E.I…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 21, 1938

Citations

255 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Matter of Paradiso v. Vuozzo

The finding is thus one of fact based on substantial evidence. This kind of an occupation can give rise to an…