From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Besch

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 9, 1911
95 N.E. 697 (N.Y. 1911)

Opinion

Argued April 25, 1911

Decided May 9, 1911

Andrew J. Nellis and Walter E. Ward for appellant.

J.S. Frost for respondent.


While we are of the opinion that the order sought to be reviewed was made without authority, we are also of the opinion that it is not a final order in a special proceeding and subject to appeal to this court, but that its validity may be tested by the appellant when any attempt is made to punish him for failing to comply with the order. ( Matter of Strong v. Randall, 177 N.Y. 400.) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed, but, under the circumstances, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., VANN, WERNER, HISCOCK and COLLIN, JJ.; HAIGHT, J., concurs only in the dismissal of the appeal. Absent: GRAY, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Besch

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 9, 1911
95 N.E. 697 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for

Matter of Besch

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH BESCH, Respondent, for the…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 9, 1911

Citations

95 N.E. 697 (N.Y. 1911)
202 N.Y. 552

Citing Cases

Rudiger v. Coleman

The order is entitled in the action and in our opinion it was not made in a special proceeding at all, but is…