From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Benson v. Town of Saugerties

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 20, 1991
174 A.D.2d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

June 20, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ulster County.


It is the taxpayer's burden to make out a prima facie case that a tax assessment is erroneous (Matter of General Motors Corp. Cent. Foundry Div. v Assessor of Town of Massena, 146 A.D.2d 851, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 604). Here, having found, inter alia, that two of the sales upon which petitioner's expert relied in preparing his appraisal were not comparable to the subject property, the Hearing Officer properly rejected the appraisal report (see, supra). Therefore, insofar as petitioner failed to present sufficient proof to overcome the presumption that the assessment was correct or to support the claim of unequal assessment, the Hearing Officer's decision not to reduce the existing assessment must be upheld (see, Matter of Carriage House Motor Inn v City of Watertown, 136 A.D.2d 895, affd 72 N.Y.2d 990). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and rejected as lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Benson v. Town of Saugerties

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 20, 1991
174 A.D.2d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Benson v. Town of Saugerties

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DORIS BENSON, Petitioner, v. TOWN OF SAUGERTIES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

In re Blue Circle, Inc.

In our view these discrepancies, which were brought out during cross-examination, support the Referee's…