From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bd. of Educ. v. Patchogue-Medford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1988
144 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

November 28, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Brown, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the application is denied, and the arbitration award is confirmed.

The collective bargaining agreement between the petitioner and the respondent contains a provision which requires the petitioner school district to provide a probationary candidate for tenure with such supervisory assistance as the candidate requires to point out weaknesses, and to suggest ways and means of improving the candidate's teaching. The arbitrator found that this procedural provision of the agreement was violated by the petitioner's failure to advise a probationary candidate for tenure of the standard of attendance that she would have to meet as one of the elements in her evaluation for tenure. Since the arbitrator's award was neither irrational nor in excess of his authority, it should not have been vacated (see, Matter of Board of Educ. [Hess], 49 N.Y.2d 145; Matter of Broadalbin Teachers Assn. [Broadalbin Cent. School Dist.], 97 A.D.2d 672). Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the evaluation provision as construed by the arbitrator does not infringe upon the petitioner's responsibility and authority to make tenure decisions. Rather, it merely imposes certain procedural requirements which must be complied with before a probationary appointment is terminated, and interprets these procedural requirements so as to effectuate the purpose of the evaluation provision of the collective bargaining agreement which requires supervisory assistance. Requiring such supplemental procedural steps preliminary to the final action of granting or withholding tenure does not violate public policy (Matter of Cohoes City School Dist. v. Cohoes Teachers Assn., 40 N.Y.2d 774; Board of Educ. v. Bellmore-Merrick United Secondary Teachers, 39 N.Y.2d 167, 173; Matter of Broadalbin Teachers Assn. [Broadalbin Cent. School Dist.], supra; Board of Educ. v. Elwood Teachers' Alliance, 94 A.D.2d 692). Weinstein, J.P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Bd. of Educ. v. Patchogue-Medford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1988
144 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Bd. of Educ. v. Patchogue-Medford

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE PATCHOGUE-MEDFORD UNION FREE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1988

Citations

144 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

South Country Central School District v. Bellport Teachers Ass'n

Moreover, courts have refused to stay arbitration on the proffered ground that the only remedy an arbitrator…

Matter of Bd. of Educ. v. Patchogue-Medford Congress

Decided May 2, 1989 Appeal from (2d dept: 144 A.D.2d 666) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…