From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bartsch v. Seneca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 1965
24 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

November 4, 1965


Order entered September 28, 1964, herein appealed from, unanimously modified on the law to strike the provision directing payment of counsel fee for petitioner in the sum of $750, and as so modified is otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party. In this filiation and support proceeding respondent appeared on the return day and acknowledged paternity of the infant. The question then remaining was what provision should be made for support of such infant. While the court has power, once an order of filiation is made, to allow counsel fees to the attorney for the mother, such discretionary power can only be exercised "if she is unable to pay such counsel fees" (Family Ct. Act, § 536; Anonymous v. Anonymous, 20 Misc.2d 753). There was no showing here that the petitioner was unable to pay a counsel fee; on the contrary the record indicates that she had already paid the sum of $2,500 to her attorney.

Concur — Rabin, J.P., Stevens, Steuer and Staley, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Bartsch v. Seneca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 1965
24 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Matter of Bartsch v. Seneca

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DORIS BARTSCH, Appellant-Respondent, v. CARLO SENECA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1965

Citations

24 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Matter of Pamela v. Terence

However, the Family Court is empowered to award counsel fees incurred in defending such an appeal (see,…

Matter of Mary E.C. v. Donald S

Thus, although the wording of section 438 Fam. Ct. Act of the Family Court Act and section 237 Dom. Rel. of…