From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Barnes v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1985
115 A.D.2d 221 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 15, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Flynn, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Pine, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Wyoming County, for a hearing, in accordance with the following memorandum: In this CPLR article 78 proceeding petitioner, an inmate at the Attica Correctional Facility, maintains that he should not be punished for violation of a facility rule where there has been no showing that he ever received a copy of the rule book. We agree. "No inmate shall be disciplined except for a violation of a published and posted written rule or regulation, a copy of which has been provided the inmate" (Correction Law § 138; Matter of Saunders v Smith, 99 A.D.2d 671). The hearing court erroneously concluded that petitioner was, in effect, constructively on notice of the local rule. The statute specifically requires actual knowledge of the institutional rule as the basis for discipline (Matter of Collins v Hammock, 52 N.Y.2d 798, 800). Hence, a further hearing is required to determine whether petitioner received a copy of the institutional rule book. If not, all charges involving violation of this rule should be expunged from petitioner's institutional record.


Summaries of

Matter of Barnes v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1985
115 A.D.2d 221 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Barnes v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RICHARD BARNES, Appellant, v. HAROLD J. SMITH, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 221 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of Shakoor v. Coughlin

This disposition was subsequently affirmed administratively, prompting petitioner to institute this CPLR…

Matter of Burgos v. Kuhlmann

While it is correct that subdivision (2) is silent on the specific language in which the copies of the rules…