From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Banks v. City School Dist., Albany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 7, 1999
257 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

January 7, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court (Hughes, J.).


Plaintiff commenced this negligence action against defendant seeking to recover for the injuries sustained by her fourth-grade daughter, Courtney Young, as a result of a fall on school property shortly after dismissal on the afternoon of February 27, 1995. Supreme Court's order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant has prompted this appeal. Plaintiff's sole argument on appeal relates to defendant's alleged failure to properly supervise Young.

According to Young, she was walking on a sidewalk in front of the school when she observed what appeared to be a thrown snowball on the sidewalk's edge which she described to be "the size of a small bowl". Although there was plenty of room to avoid the chunk of snow, Young deliberately stepped on it because she "thought it would be easy to crush". In so doing, she fell and injured herself.

"School districts are under a duty to adequately supervise students in their care and will be liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Foster v. New Berlin Cent. School Dist., 246 A.D.2d 880, 881; see, Mirand v. City of New York, 84 N.Y.2d 44; Tomlinson v. Board of Educ., 183 A.D.2d 1023). Even assuming that a triable issue of fact exists with respect to defendant's negligent supervision, liability does not lie absent a showing that it constituted a proximate cause of Young's injuries (see, Foster v. New Berlin Cent. School Dist., supra; Tomlinson v. Board of Educ., supra). Here, "`[t]he presence or absence of supervision was not a contributory factor in the happening of the accident'" (Tomlinson v. Board of Educ., supra, at 1024, quoting Gattyan v. Scarsdale Union Free School Dist. No. 1, 152 A.D.2d 650, 652; cf., Vonungern v. Morris Cent. School, 240 A.D.2d 926). It is undisputed that Young fell because she made a spontaneous and voluntary decision to step on a small chunk of snow on the sidewalk. Having made this choice, plaintiff cannot now recover from defendant for Young's resulting injuries since "the manner in which [Young's] injury occurred could have happened even if [s]he had been supervised" (Walsh v. City School Dist., 237 A.D.2d 811, 812).

As a final matter, we note that whether Young fell on the sidewalk while walking, as claimed by plaintiff in her complaint and bill of particulars, or in a grassy area adjacent to the sidewalk during a game of tag, as asserted by her friends and school personnel and now argued by plaintiff on appeal, is of no moment. Although there was conflicting evidence as to where Young fell and what Young was doing prior to falling, no witness disputed Young's testimony that she fell after intentionally stepping on the chunk of snow.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Banks v. City School Dist., Albany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 7, 1999
257 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Banks v. City School Dist., Albany

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DEBORA BANKS, Individually and as Guardian of COURTNEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 7, 1999

Citations

257 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
682 N.Y.S.2d 474

Citing Cases

Weinblatt v. Eastchester Union Free School

We affirm. The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by…

Osorio v. Thomas Balsley Assoc

The threshold issue is not whether plaintiff assumed a dangerous risk, but whether he, in fact, created one.…