From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Baker v. Monahan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1977
42 N.Y.2d 1074 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued October 14, 1977

Decided October 17, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, HAROLD J. HUGHES, J.

Richard A. Hanft for appellant.

Richard J. Farley, Jr., for petitioners-respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

The mandate of subdivision 12 of section 143 is explicit. The Legislature has directed, as all concede that it has power to do, that failures to comply with the time prescriptions of the Election Law shall be fatal defects. The intent and effect was to make it "crystal clear that the time limitations for filing are mandatory" and to foreclose the judiciary from fashioning exceptions, however reasonable they might be made to appear (Matter of Carr v New York State Bd. of Elections, 40 N.Y.2d 556).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of Baker v. Monahan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1977
42 N.Y.2d 1074 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

Matter of Baker v. Monahan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT J. BAKER et al., Respondents, v. THOMAS M…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 17, 1977

Citations

42 N.Y.2d 1074 (N.Y. 1977)
399 N.Y.S.2d 643
369 N.E.2d 1177

Citing Cases

Seawright v. Bd. of Elections in the City of N.Y.

The Election Law provides that "[t]he failure to file any petition or certificate relating to the designation…

Rhoades v. Westchester Cnty. Bd. of Elections

ORDERED that the amended final order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.…