From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Atkins v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 15, 1981
84 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

October 15, 1981


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Comptroller, which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits. Petitioner was employed as a school aide at a preschool program for retarded children. One of her duties was to assist the children in getting off the bus, for which she was given specific training in how to lift children. Following an injury to her right arm and neck while lifting a child from the school bus on January 16, 1976, petitioner became disabled and her application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied by the Comptroller on the ground that the incident in question did not constitute an accident within the meaning of section 63 Retire. Soc. Sec. of the Retirement and Social Security Law. This article 78 proceeding to review that determination ensued. It is well established that the Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority in determining all forms of retirement applications (Retirement and Social Security Law, § 74, subd b) and, therefore, his determination that a particular incident did not constitute an accident should be upheld if supported by substantial evidence. Since the performance of duties ordinarily and normally expected of an applicant which result in the onset of physical disability do not constitute an accident within the meaning of section 63 Retire. Soc. Sec. of the Retirement and Social Security Law (Matter of Sorge v. Levitt, 71 A.D.2d 767), the Comptroller's determination must be upheld since it is undisputed that petitioner's disability resulted from physical exertion in the performance of her usual and customary work (Matter of Ballou v Levitt, 70 A.D.2d 1000). Petitioner's mistaken belief that she suffered an "accident" because she did not expect to incur an injury when lifting the child does not require a contrary result. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Weiss, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Atkins v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 15, 1981
84 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Matter of Atkins v. Regan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CLEMENTEEN ATKINS, Petitioner, v. EDWARD V. REGAN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1981

Citations

84 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Matter of Wallace v. Regan

Although the incident of January 25, 1975 could be considered an accident within the statute (cf. Matter of…

Matter of Smith v. N.Y. St. L. Retire. Sys

Here, in her application for accidental disability retirement benefits petitioner described her injury as…