Opinion
November 13, 1959
Present — Foster, P.J., Bergan, Coon, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen's Compensation Board. The claimant went to work for this employer in 1948 as general manager and his work involved dispatching taxi drivers, collecting their cash receipts and keeping records. From 1948 until 1956 when he left work to enter the Veterans' Hospital he worked in offices at two different locations. Both of these were located in the garages where the taxis were repaired and painted and as a result the claimant was exposed to exhaust and paint fumes. The claimant's condition was diagnosed as emphysema, chronic upper respiratory infection and pulmonary tuberculosis. Medical testimony indicated that the emphysema, which was of long standing. had been aggravated by the exposure to noxious fumes. The Referee disallowed the claim and the board reversed finding that the emphysema was an occupational disease which had been aggravated by the exposure to fumes. The rule was laid down in Matter of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp. ( 309 N.Y. 558). that the aggravation of a condition which is not occupational in nature, cannot be considered an occupational disease. Similarly this court has held that where there is no proof which relates the disease to the occupation generally or which demonstrates that the disease is a hazard to which all employees in the same kind of employment are exposed a finding of occupational disease cannot be upheld ( Matter of Conroy v. Rupert Fish Co., 8 A.D.2d 553; Matter of Smith v. Sports Room Supper Club, 7 A.D.2d 809). There is no proof in this record indicating that emphysema is a disease which is a common hazard of or a natural incident to this type of employment generally and the finding of occupational disease cannot therefore be sustained. Decision and award unanimously reversed and claim dismissed, with costs to the appellants against the Workmen's Compensation Board.