Opinion
January 14, 1999.
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.).
Inadequacies and inconsistencies in the documentation presented by petitioner to the Rent Administrator justified the challenged determination ( see, Matter of Pechock v. New York State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 253 A.D.2d 655). Petitioner's attempt to cure those deficiencies upon administrative review of the Rent Administrator's determination was properly rejected by respondent as consideration of newly advanced factual matter at that level of the administrative proceedings would, under the circumstances of this matter, have been inappropriate ( see, Matter of Levine v. New York State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 243 A.D.2d 373). We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them to be unavailing.
Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.