From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arce v. Eagen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 2, 1999
267 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

December 2, 1999

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered November 17, 1998 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

George Arce, Elmira, appellant in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., MIKOLL, CREW III, GRAFFEO and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding principally challenging a determination denying his grievance. Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction and we affirm. Attached to respondent's motion to dismiss is his sworn affidavit averring that he was never served with a copy of the amended order to show cause, petition or supporting papers which were to be sent to him by first class mail in accordance with the relaxed service requirement provided in the amended order to show cause. Although petitioner informed Supreme Court of his claim that he sent a copy of the petition through the facility "pouch mail" service, the fact remains that, even if this assertion is true, service of only the petition does not comply with the dictates of the amended order to show cause and there is no evidence that his imprisonment created an obstacle preventing his compliance with this directive (see, Matter of Lomonaco v. Travis, 264 A.D.2d 872, 695 N.Y.S.2d 616). Thus, the petition was properly dismissed (see, Matter of Seifert v. Selsky, 260 A.D.2d 823).

CARDONA, P.J., MIKOLL, CREW III, GRAFFEO and MUGGLIN, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Arce v. Eagen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 2, 1999
267 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Arce v. Eagen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GEORGE ARCE, Appellant, v. THOMAS G. EAGEN, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 748

Citing Cases

Matter of Morales v. Selsky

We affirm. "Failure of an inmate to satisfy the service requirements set forth in an order to show cause…

Matter of Mathie v. Dennison

Having failed to do so, petitioner did not comply with the service directives in the amended order to show…