From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Applegate v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 11, 1996
226 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 11, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ulster County (Connor, J.).


Prior to his transfer to another correctional facility, petitioner was an inmate law clerk at Shawangunk Correctional Facility in Ulster County. While at that facility, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an administrative determination prohibiting him from taking another inmate's legal materials back to his cell. This determination was made pursuant to the Department of Correctional Services' policy requiring inmate law clerks to conduct their legal assistance activities in the law library. Petitioner asserted, inter alia, that this policy was unconstitutional in that it unreasonably interfered with an inmate's access to the courts. Supreme Court rejected this argument and dismissed the petition. Petitioner appeals.

Inasmuch as petitioner has been transferred to another correctional facility and is no longer an inmate law clerk, we find that his challenge is now moot ( see, Matter of Cortez v Wilmot, 115 A.D.2d 140). Petitioner has failed to articulate, and we are unable to discern, any exception to the mootness doctrine. Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Applegate v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 11, 1996
226 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Applegate v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BRADFORD APPLEGATE, Appellant, v. THOMAS COUGHLIN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 11, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 825

Citing Cases

Matter of McKenna v. Goord

Because petitioner has been transferred to another correctional facility, his mail will no longer be opened…

James v. Cary

The proceeding was dismissed based on his failure to exhaust administrative remedies, prompting this appeal.…