Opinion
February 23, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (David H. Edwards, J.).
No appeal lies from an order denying resettlement of the substantive portions of a judgment or order (Murphy v Wack, 186 A.D.2d 427). Since the amendment petitioner seeks involves substantive issues relating to the interplay between the judgment and purported rights arising under the Union contract, our decision in Murphy v Wack (supra) is controlling, and the appeal must be dismissed. Nor is there any basis to amend the judgment in other respects urged by petitioner.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Ellerin and Ross, JJ.