From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Anrig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1980
73 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

January 21, 1980


In a proceeding to recover possession of certain joint bank accounts claimed to be assets of the estate of Otto L. Anrig, the appeal is from a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Suffolk County, entered November 9, 1978, which, after a hearing, directed the appellant to turn over the proceeds and interest of those bank accounts to the administrator of the estate. Decree affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant. The record indicates that appellant entered into a fiduciary and confidential relationship with the decedent. The decedent had been institutionalized for three and a half years before his death and the appellant was managing his affairs during this period pursuant to a power of attorney. Under these circumstances the presumption granted to the appellant as the surviving tenant of the joint bank accounts (see Banking Law, § 675) was rebutted and the burden of proof shifted to the appellant to prove that the joint accounts were valid gifts (see Matter of McMurdo, 56 A.D.2d 602). On this record, the appellant has not established by clear and convincing evidence that the decedent intended to make a gift of the accounts in question (see Matter of Fiumara, 44 N.Y.2d 915; Rametta v. Kazlo, 68 A.D.2d 579). We have considered the remaining contentions of the appellant and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Lazer, Gibbons and Margett, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Anrig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1980
73 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Matter of Anrig

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of OTTO L. ANRIG, Deceased. ROBERT ANRIG, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1980

Citations

73 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Mortellaro v. Mortellaro

In this case, acceptance may not be implied because intent and delivery are lacking. Furthermore, there is no…

Matter of MacGregor

There is no indication that decedent could not, nor did not, resume possession of the instrument. Since…