From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Am. Silk Mills Corp., Meinhard-Commercial

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 2, 1972
291 N.E.2d 385 (N.Y. 1972)

Opinion

Argued September 29, 1972

Decided November 2, 1972

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ABRAHAM J. GELLINOFF, J.

Frederic P. Houston, Arthur A. Greenfield and Carroll G. Moore for appellants.

John J. Sheehy, Caesar L. Pitassy and Rex W. Mixon, Jr. for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON. Chief Judge FULD and Judge BURKE dissent and vote to reverse and reinstate the judgment of Special Term upon the ground that the question of interest should be submitted to arbitration.


Summaries of

Matter of Am. Silk Mills Corp., Meinhard-Commercial

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 2, 1972
291 N.E.2d 385 (N.Y. 1972)
Case details for

Matter of Am. Silk Mills Corp., Meinhard-Commercial

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between AMERICAN SILK MILLS CORPORATION…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 2, 1972

Citations

291 N.E.2d 385 (N.Y. 1972)
291 N.E.2d 385
339 N.Y.S.2d 104

Citing Cases

Grosz v. Serge Sabarsky, Inc.

Should blockage be determined to apply to the 90 missing works after the hearing directed above, then the…

Great Amer Ins Co v. Ramasso

(Matter of Macy v National Sleep Prods., 39 N.Y.2d 268, 270; Matter of Howard Co. v Daly, 27 N.Y.2d 285, 288;…