From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Alper v. Hayduk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 21, 1979
71 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

August 21, 1979


In a proceeding to validate petitions designating petitioner Seymour Alper as a candidate in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 11, 1979 for the public office of Supervisor of the Town of Yorktown, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 15, 1979, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The basic issue presented on this appeal is whether an oath taken before a notary can be substituted for a verification. Section 16-116 Elec. of the Election Law requires a verification. CPLR 3021 sets forth the form of verification. Since petitioner failed to comply with its provisions we have no choice but to affirm the judgment dismissing the proceeding. If the form of verification currently required is to be changed, such change should come from the Legislature. Mollen, P.J., O'Connor, Rabin, Shapiro and Gibbons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Alper v. Hayduk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 21, 1979
71 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Matter of Alper v. Hayduk

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SEYMOUR ALPER, Appellant, v. ALBERT T. HAYDUK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 21, 1979

Citations

71 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Matter of Rose v. Smith

Here, the petitions were all notarized, a circumstance which obviates the argument of prejudice or…

Polenz v. Marcantonio

This principle has been regularly applied (see Matter of Dusaneko v. Le Fever , 84 AD2d 583 [2d Dept 1981] ;…