Summary
affirming that inmate was guilty of assault on staff, despite correction officer's candid acknowledgment that his injury possibly could have been sustained accidentally, where evidence showed that inmate resisted officer's effort to subdue him, during which officer's elbow was cut by razor blade
Summary of this case from Simon v. SelskyOpinion
September 10, 1998
We are unpersuaded by petitioner's challenge to the determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting assault on an inmate, assault on staff (two charges), fighting and possession of a weapon arising out of an incident in which petitioner slashed another prison inmate with a razor and also cut Correction Officer S. Robisch during the course of his effort to subdue petitioner. First, we conclude that the Hearing Officer did not err in taking Robisch's testimony via speaker phone due to the fact that Robisch was covering the facility housing unit at the time of the hearing and there was no one available to relieve him ( see, Matter of Greany v. Irvin, 221 A.D.2d 1027, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 803). Notably, petitioner was present at the time of the questioning and, in fact, presented three pages of questions which the Hearing Officer put to Robisch on petitioner's behalf.
Second, notwithstanding Robisch's candid acknowledgment that his injury possibly could have been sustained accidentally, record evidence that petitioner resisted Robisch's effort to subdue him and that Robisch's elbow was cut by the razor blade in the process provides sufficient factual support for the finding that petitioner was guilty of assault on staff ( cf., Matter of Lashway v. Coughlin, 220 A.D.2d 912). Petitioner's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or have been found to be lacking in merit.
Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.