From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Aleman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 2, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 1017 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Decided July 2, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Martin B. Stecher, J.

Raymond J. MacDonnell and Thomas Torto for appellant.

Jerry V. Weinberg for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, the award of the master arbitrator vacated and the award of the arbitration panel reinstated.

A review of the master arbitrator's determination indicates that, in modifying the arbitration panel's award, he engaged in extensive factual review and reached his conclusion based upon an impermissible weighing of the evidence ( Matter of Petrofsky [ Allstate Ins. Co.], 54 N.Y.2d 207; Matter of Smith [ Firemen's Ins. Co.], 55 N.Y.2d 224). There was evidence before the arbitration panel to support its finding that the injured party's condition was congenital and was not aggravated by the accident. Moreover, there is no indication that the panel disregarded any of the evidence before it. Accordingly, its award cannot be viewed as irrational or unsupported by the evidence in the record.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed, with costs, award of the master arbitrator vacated and award of the arbitration panel reinstated in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Aleman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 2, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 1017 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Aleman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between HECTOR M. ALEMAN, Respondent, and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 2, 1984

Citations

62 N.Y.2d 1017 (N.Y. 1984)
479 N.Y.S.2d 494
468 N.E.2d 676

Citing Cases

Omega Acupuncture PC v. USAA Gen. Indem. Co.

A master arbitrator's powers of review does not encompass a de novo review of the matter presented to the…

Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Margolis

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. We agree with the holding of the Supreme Court that "[a]…