From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Alchar Realty v. Meredith Restaurant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 11, 1939
256 App. Div. 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Summary

In Alchar Realty Corp. v. Meredith Restaurant, Inc. (256 App. Div. 853) this court determined that an arguable controversy did not exist. Order reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ., concur.

Summary of this case from Matter of Esbeco Distilling Corporation v. Block

Opinion

January 11, 1939.

Appeal from Albany Special Term.


Jacob Wald alleges that he loaned $200 to the Meredith Restaurant, Inc., on February second; that on February fourth the restaurant assigned to him the proceeds of the liquor license, when it should be surrendered; that he advanced $300 more on February seventh, and $350 on February fourteenth. His assignment was filed with the Comptroller on February ninth, and on February tenth its judgment was recovered by the realty corporation against the Meredith Restaurant, Inc. In March, 1938, the restaurant filed application to recover the refund, and asked to have it paid to its president, Joseph Rosenblum. After examining the president of the Meredith Restaurant, Inc., and on April 6, 1938, the Comptroller was enjoined from paying the money to Wald or Rosenblum. At the time the assignment was made the license had not been surrendered, and nothing was due to the assignor. The assignment did not pass title to the proceeds when they became payable, but at most created an equitable lien between the parties thereto. And any rights or title acquired thereunder were equitable only, and could be enforced only in an action in equity in which the title to property could be tried. ( Field v. Mayor, 6 N.Y. 179, 186, 187; McCaffrey v. Woodin, 65 id. 459, 463, 464; Hovey v. Elliott, 118 id. 124, 135, 136, 137; Matter of Black, 138 App. Div. 562, 564, 565.) Order affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent, Alchar Realty Corp. Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Hill, P.J., concurs in the decision denying the motion to set aside the subpoena but dissents from the portion of the order that directs the payment by the Comptroller to the judgment creditor.


Summaries of

Matter of Alchar Realty v. Meredith Restaurant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 11, 1939
256 App. Div. 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

In Alchar Realty Corp. v. Meredith Restaurant, Inc. (256 App. Div. 853) this court determined that an arguable controversy did not exist. Order reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ., concur.

Summary of this case from Matter of Esbeco Distilling Corporation v. Block
Case details for

Matter of Alchar Realty v. Meredith Restaurant

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: ALCHAR REALTY CORP., Judgment…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 11, 1939

Citations

256 App. Div. 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Schaffer Brewing Co. v. Amsterdam Tavern

Here the assignment of the liquor refund was executed January 24, 1938, at a time when no right to such…

Ryan v. O'Leary

After the assignments were made, the assignor had no title to the refund money to which liens of…