From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Agusta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 1991
171 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Summary

In Matter of Agusta (171 A.D.2d 595 [1st Dept. 1991]), also relied on by Kvaerner, the Court held that the deposition of a nonparty foreign national could not be compelled except by application pursuant to the Hague Convention.

Summary of this case from Tokyo-Mitsubishi v. Kvaerner

Opinion

March 26, 1991

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, New York County (Marie M. Lambert, S.).


This proceeding relates to the Estate of Corrado Agusta, an Italian citizen, who died June 14, 1989 in Switzerland, where he was domiciled. In his will, decedent left all his assets to his only child, Riccardo Agusta, an Italian citizen who resides in the Principality of Monaco. Petitioner Francesca Agusta, the estranged wife of the decedent and Riccardo's stepmother, was specifically disinherited by decedent's will.

On July 28, 1989, Francesca filed a petition in the Surrogate's Court requesting the appointment of a temporary administrator pursuant to SCPA 901, claiming decedent owned property in New York which needed to be protected. Francesca thereafter moved for an order compelling Riccardo's deposition in New York. Riccardo opposed the motion on the ground he was neither a party to the proceeding nor a domiciliary or resident of New York or the United States, and could not be compelled to testify unless ordered by a competent court of Monaco. The Surrogate granted the motion, and ordered Riccardo to appear for deposition in New York.

The order should be reversed. In Orlich v Helm Bros. ( 160 A.D.2d 135, 143), this Court held that "[w]hen discovery is sought from a nonparty in a foreign jurisdiction, application of the Hague Convention [23 UST 2555, TIAS No. 7444], which encompasses principles of international comity, is virtually compulsory." This Court explained in Orlich that "[s]ince fact gathering is a judicially controlled process in civil law Nations * * * the nonjudicial taking of evidence located within their territory is regarded as an affront to their sovereignty. Such an exercise would be particularly offensive where, as here, the entity being subjected to court-ordered fact gathering * * * is not even a party to the litigation" (160 A.D.2d, supra, at 144).

The Principality of Monaco is a civil law Nation, and a signatory of the Hague Convention. We accordingly conclude that the order compelling Riccardo to testify at a deposition in New York constituted an improper assertion of power beyond the Surrogate's Court's jurisdiction.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Agusta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 1991
171 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

In Matter of Agusta (171 A.D.2d 595 [1st Dept. 1991]), also relied on by Kvaerner, the Court held that the deposition of a nonparty foreign national could not be compelled except by application pursuant to the Hague Convention.

Summary of this case from Tokyo-Mitsubishi v. Kvaerner

In Matter of Agusta, 171 A.D.2d 595, 567 N.Y.S.2d 664 [1st Dept.1991], also relied on by Kvaerner, the court held that the deposition of a non-party foreign national could not be compelled except by application pursuant to the Hague Convention.

Summary of this case from Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch v. Kvaerner
Case details for

Matter of Agusta

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of CORRADO AGUSTA, Deceased

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 26, 1991

Citations

171 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
567 N.Y.S.2d 664

Citing Cases

Ayyash v. Koleilat

They rely on the body of New York law that holds that application of the Hague Convention is “virtually…

Tokyo-Mitsubishi v. Kvaerner

The Court did not deal with whether other methods would have been appropriate for that discovery, the issue…