From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Adams v. Stinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 2, 1999
267 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

December 2, 1999

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

James Adams, Fallsburg, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter G. Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: MERCURE, J.P., CREW III, YESAWICH JR., CARPINELLO and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges the determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from fighting and possessing weapons. In addition to the misbehavior report, testimony from two correction officers who observed the incident established that petitioner was seen fighting with another inmate and, as correction officers approached, he was observed throwing an object, later identified as a razor. The other inmate sustained a laceration to his face during the fight. This evidence, together with the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Spencer v. Goord, 245 A.D.2d 827, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 811). While the correction officer who observed petitioner throwing the razor failed to endorse or prepare the misbehavior report as provided in 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 (b), under the circumstances presented here, any such error is harmless inasmuch as petitioner has failed to demonstrate any prejudice resulting therefrom (see, Matter of Bolling v. Coombe, 234 A.D.2d 730). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his challenge to the sufficiency of the misbehavior report and claim of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

MERCURE, J.P., CREW III, YESAWICH JR., CARPINELLO and MUGGLIN, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Adams v. Stinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 2, 1999
267 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Adams v. Stinson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES ADAMS, Petitioner, v. JAMES STINSON, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 746

Citing Cases

Matter of Velez v. Donelli

In any event, even if DOCS regulations required Nurse Ojida to endorse the report, her failure to do so would…

Matter of Moore v. Goord

Although the misbehavior report was not signed or endorsed by the correction officer who found the altered…