May 17, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (LaCava, J.).
Ordered the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner was not entitled to the requested information as it had been sealed pursuant to CPL 160.50 (1) (see, Public Officers Law § 87 [a]). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Eiber, O'Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
Full title:In the Matter of JOSHUA ACOSTA, Appellant, v. FRANCIS D. PHILLIPS II, as…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: May 17, 1993
" It is apparent to this court that respondents have followed proper procedures and the decision to deny…
Prall v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Corr.” It is apparent to this court that respondents have followed proper procedures and the decision to deny…