From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ackerman v. Steisel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 14, 1985
489 N.E.2d 251 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued October 14, 1985

Decided November 14, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Albert H. Buschmann, J.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Fay Leoussis and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for appellants.

Nicholas G. Garaufis and Alan M. Block for respondents.



Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 104 A.D.2d 940; see also, White v Adler, 289 N.Y. 34, 44).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER. Taking no part: Judge TITONE.


Summaries of

Matter of Ackerman v. Steisel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 14, 1985
489 N.E.2d 251 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Ackerman v. Steisel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GARY L. ACKERMAN et al., Respondents, v. NORMAN STEISEL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 14, 1985

Citations

489 N.E.2d 251 (N.Y. 1985)
489 N.E.2d 251
498 N.Y.S.2d 364

Citing Cases

Friends of Van Cortland Park, v. City of New York

"The legislative will is that Central Park should be kept open as a public park ought to be and not be turned…

Union Square Cmty. Coal. v. N.Y.C. Dept. of Parks

Under the public trust doctrine, approval is required from the New York State Legislature when there is a…