From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Academy Beer Distributors v. Commr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 17, 1994
202 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 17, 1994


Petitioner Academy Beer Distributors, Inc. (hereinafter Academy) is a wholesale and retail distributor of beer and soda. An audit conducted by the Department of Taxation and Finance of Academy's sales tax returns for the period March 1, 1981 through May 31, 1984 revealed that Academy had reported $2,565,250 in sales which it claimed were exempt from sales tax under the purchase for resale exclusion (see, Tax Law § 1101 [b] [4] [i] [A]). In response to the Department's request, Academy produced invoices showing that $1,180,229.24 of these sales came within the exclusion but was unable to substantiate its claim that the remaining $1,385,021 in sales were nontaxable. Accordingly, the Department, applying the presumption of taxability, determined that the $1,385,021 in undocumented sales were subject to sales tax (see, Tax Law § 1132 [c]). After respondent Tax Appeals Tribunal sustained this determination, petitioners commenced this proceeding.

This Court dismissed this proceeding as to Academy due to its failure to comply with Tax Law § 1138 (a) (4).

Because Academy was unable to produce any documentary evidence substantiating its claim that the subject sales were nontaxable, the Department was unable to determine if any or all of them were sales for resale (see, Matter of On the Rox Liqs. v. State Tax Commn., 124 A.D.2d 402, 404, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 603). Therefore, it was not irrational for the Department to apply the presumption of taxability and find that all of the $1,385,021 in sales were taxable (see, Matter of Ace Provision Luncheonette Supply v Chu, 135 A.D.2d 1070; Matter of Sunny Vending Co. v. State Tax Commn., 101 A.D.2d 666). We further note that, contrary to petitioners' assertion, Tax Law § 1138 (a) (1) is inapplicable to this matter because the Department accepted Academy's reported figures for gross sales (compare, Matter of Estate of Manno v State of New York Tax Commn., 147 A.D.2d 805, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 610, appeal dismissed 75 N.Y.2d 864, cert denied 498 U.S. 813). Thus, the determination is confirmed and the petition dismissed.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Academy Beer Distributors v. Commr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 17, 1994
202 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Academy Beer Distributors v. Commr

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ACADEMY BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al., Petitioners, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 108

Citing Cases

Matter of Petak v. Tax App. Tribunal of State

Nor did the Tribunal err in upholding the ALJ's finding that the audit method used to arrive at the subject…

Matter of Acad. Beer Dist. v. Com. of N.Y

Decided June 30, 1994 Appeal from (3d Dept: 202 A.D.2d 815) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…