Opinion
2021–04315 Index No. 606469/20
08-16-2023
MATRIX BELLPORT, LLC, respondent, v. CREST BELLPORT, LLC, et al., appellants.
Scarda & Associates, P.C., Port Jefferson Station, NY (William P. Caffrey, Jr., of counsel), for appellants. Russo, Karl, Widmaier & Cordano, PLLC, Hauppauge, NY (Richard T. Cordano of counsel), for respondent.
Scarda & Associates, P.C., Port Jefferson Station, NY (William P. Caffrey, Jr., of counsel), for appellants.
Russo, Karl, Widmaier & Cordano, PLLC, Hauppauge, NY (Richard T. Cordano of counsel), for respondent.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, PAUL WOOTEN, JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER In an action to recover on a promissory note and personal guaranty, commenced by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Elizabeth H. Emerson, J), entered May 3, 2021. The judgment, upon an order of the same court dated March 11, 2021, granting the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, is in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants in the total sum of $2,514,590.66.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant Crest Bellport, LLC (hereinafter the LLC), by its manager, the defendant Enrico Scarda, executed a promissory note in favor of the plaintiff. Scarda personally guaranteed the LLC's obligations under the note. The LLC allegedly defaulted on the note. The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants to recover on the note and guaranty by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213. In an order dated March 11, 2021, the Supreme Court granted the motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint. On May 3, 2021, a judgment was entered upon the order in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants in the total sum of $2,514,590.66. The defendants appeal.
The plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law through its submission of the promissory note, which contained an unequivocal and unconditional obligation to pay, the guaranty, and evidence that the defendants failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of those instruments (see Margarella v. Ullian, 164 A.D.3d 898, 899, 83 N.Y.S.3d 569 ; Assevero v. Rihan, 144 A.D.3d 1061, 1062, 42 N.Y.S.3d 300 ). In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to a bona fide defense to nonpayment (see Margarella v. Ullian, 164 A.D.3d at 899, 83 N.Y.S.3d 569 ; Castle Restoration & Constr., Inc. v. Castle Restoration, LLC, 122 A.D.3d 789, 790, 997 N.Y.S.2d 147 ).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
DILLON, J.P., MILLER, WOOTEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.