From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mathis v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 4, 1917
194 S.W. 159 (Tex. Crim. App. 1917)

Opinion

No. 4424.

Decided April 4, 1917.

Resisting Officer — Appeal Bond — Recognizance — Jurisdiction.

Where appellant entered into an appeal bond instead of a recognizance as required by the statute, no jurisdiction attaches to this court, and the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal from the County Court of Titus. Tried below before the Hon. J.W. Tabb.

Appeal from a conviction of resisting an officer; penalty, a fine of twenty-five dollars.

The opinion states the case.

Sturgeon Blackburn, for appellant.

E.B. Hendricks, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.


Appellant was convicted for resisting an officer, his punishment being assessed at a fine of twenty-five dollars.

The record shows that appellant entered into an appeal bond signed by himself and sureties, and approved by the sheriff, and filed same with the county clerk. Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney General to dismiss the appeal because appellant did not in open court enter into a recognizance as required by the statute as a means of attaching the jurisdiction of this court on appeal. The motion of the Assistant Attorney General will have to be sustained, and accordingly the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Mathis v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 4, 1917
194 S.W. 159 (Tex. Crim. App. 1917)
Case details for

Mathis v. the State

Case Details

Full title:A.G. MATHIS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Apr 4, 1917

Citations

194 S.W. 159 (Tex. Crim. App. 1917)
81 Tex. Crim. 167

Citing Cases

Pope v. State

There appears in this record a bond approved by the sheriff and the county judge of date March 22, 1929,…