From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mathis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 5, 1975
317 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-782.

September 5, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Robert W. Rawlins, Jr., J.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Ellen Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


While admitting that he told the undercover agents that the tablets he was offering were LSD, appellant claimed at his trial that they were really birth control pills. The state chemist said it was LSD and the jury agreed. Appellant's conviction and five-year sentence for illegal delivery of LSD is affirmed.

However, the adjudication and six-month sentence for direct criminal contempt must be set aside because the judge failed to follow the procedure prescribed by Rule 3.830, RCrP. Speller v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 305 So.2d 231. Nothing herein shall preclude further proceedings on the charge of contempt.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

BOARDMAN, Acting C.J., and SCHEB, J., concur.


Summaries of

Mathis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 5, 1975
317 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Mathis v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVE MATHIS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 5, 1975

Citations

317 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Garber v. State

The rule also requires the defendant be given the opportunity to present evidence of excusing or mitigating…