From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mathis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 3, 1974
211 S.E.2d 400 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

49855.

ARGUED NOVEMBER 4, 1974.

DECIDED DECEMBER 3, 1974.

Aggravated assault. Berrien Superior Court. Before Judge Lott.

Sumner Mitchell, Douglas W. Mitchell, III, Yancey Perkins, Dane Perkins, for appellant.

Vickers Neugent, District Attorney, W. S. Perry, for appellee.


The defendant was indicted for aggravated assault. The indictment also charged that he had been previously convicted of an offense and sentenced to confinement and labor in the penitentiary. His special demurrer to the indictment on the ground that it contained prejudicial matter relating to a prior offense was overruled. During the guilt or innocence stage of the trial, the previous conviction was admitted over objection. Held:

1. It was not error to overrule the special demurrer for it is required that before recidivist punishment can be imposed, the defendant must have been indicted under the applicable recidivist statute, in this case Code Ann. § 27-2511. Tribble v. State, 168 Ga. 699 ( 148 S.E. 593). However, under our bifurcated trial procedure, it is reversible error, absent a waiver, to disclose the previous conviction during the guilt or innocence phase of the trial. Riggins v. Stynchombe, 231 Ga. 589, 592 ( 203 S.E.2d 208). We reverse for this reason.

2. It is not error for the trial court to fail to give requested instructions in the exact language requested where the court charged substantially the same principles contained in the requests. Jackson v. State, 225 Ga. 553 ( 170 S.E.2d 281).

Judgment reversed. Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur.

ARGUED NOVEMBER 4, 1974 — DECIDED DECEMBER 3, 1974.


Summaries of

Mathis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 3, 1974
211 S.E.2d 400 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Mathis v. State

Case Details

Full title:MATHIS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Dec 3, 1974

Citations

211 S.E.2d 400 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
211 S.E.2d 400

Citing Cases

London v. State

The court charged fully on the presumption of innocence and is not required to charge in the language…

Hammond v. State

Accordingly, as we cannot find the error to be harmless, it is error requiring reversal. See Mathis v. State,…