From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matheny v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 20, 1983
429 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-515.

April 20, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Harry Lee Coe, III, J.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Bryan E. Hopkins, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Diane Barrs, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error, and we therefore affirm the judgment and sentence entered by the trial court on January 22, 1982.

However, subsequent to the entry of the above-mentioned judgment and sentence, and the filing of a notice of appeal by the appellant, the trial court modified said sentence. Since the filing of the notice of appeal vested exclusive jurisdiction in this court, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to modify the sentence. Kelly v. State, 359 So.2d 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). We accordingly strike the order modifying the sentence appealed from without prejudice to the appellant filing a proper motion for modification of his sentence pursuant to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

AFFIRMED.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.


Summaries of

Matheny v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 20, 1983
429 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Matheny v. State

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD DUANE MATHENY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 20, 1983

Citations

429 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Figone v. Downey

Faced with the prospect of a return to state prison notwithstanding the outcome of the new charges, Figone…