From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matheis v. Myers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1993
199 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 27, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the cross motion is denied, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted by Cari Medwin.

Approximately five months after the plaintiff Cari Medwin was involved in the motor vehicle accident which gave rise to this action, she was involved in a second motor vehicle accident. This action was not commenced until after the occurrence of the second accident. The only competent medical report which Medwin has submitted in opposition to the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by her is an affirmation by Dr. Paul Post written in 1991. Dr. Post's affidavit fails to indicate an awareness of the second accident. Based on a consideration of these factors, we conclude that Medwin has failed to establish that any "serious injuries" which she has sustained were the result of the first accident (see, Gaddy v Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955; Oswald v Ospina, 187 A.D.2d 570; Zaffuto v Martorano, 161 A.D.2d 639). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, O'Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matheis v. Myers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1993
199 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matheis v. Myers

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN MATHEIS, Plaintiff, and CARI MEDWIN, Respondent, v. ROBERT J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
606 N.Y.S.2d 34

Citing Cases

Ligrnetta v. Campos

NYS2d 172; Blasse v Laub, 65 AD3d 509, 882 NYS2d 921; Kin Chong Ku v Baldwin-Bell, 61 AD3d 938, 880 NYS2d 76;…