From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mastromonica v. Conklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 1998
246 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

January 20, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant's motion papers failed to establish a prima facie case that the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Patricia Mastromonica were not serious ( see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Mendola v. Demetres, 212 A.D.2d 515). The report prepared by Ms. Mastromonica's treating orthopedist indicated a decreased range of motion of her neck and the report of her treating dentist revealed that she was limited in her ability to open her mouth.

Rosenblatt, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mastromonica v. Conklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 1998
246 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Mastromonica v. Conklin

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA MASTROMONICA et al., Respondents, v. ANTOINETTE R. CONKLIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 20, 1998

Citations

246 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
667 N.Y.S.2d 281

Citing Cases

Tillman v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In support of their motion for summary…

Silverstein v. DiFasano

In support of her motion, the defendant submitted, inter alia, the affirmed medical report of the physician…