From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Masterson v. Starr Indem. & Liab. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
Apr 5, 2013
3:13-CV-00079-BRW (E.D. Ark. Apr. 5, 2013)

Opinion

3:13-CV-00079-BRW

04-05-2013

WILLIAM MASTERSON PLAINTIFF v. STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY COMPANY DEFENDANT


ORDER

Pending is Defendant's unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery Request (Doc. No. 7). Defendant's Motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, neither party is obligated to answer discovery requests served before the Rule 26(f) conference. Both parties must wait until after their Rule 26(f) conference to conduct discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of April, 2013.

Billy Roy Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Masterson v. Starr Indem. & Liab. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
Apr 5, 2013
3:13-CV-00079-BRW (E.D. Ark. Apr. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Masterson v. Starr Indem. & Liab. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM MASTERSON PLAINTIFF v. STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION

Date published: Apr 5, 2013

Citations

3:13-CV-00079-BRW (E.D. Ark. Apr. 5, 2013)